Oduah stressed that she and all the other lawmakers from Anambra state have not been sacked by the Supreme Court contrary to media reports.
'Sacked' Anambra PDP senators |
Senator Stella Oduah On Friday in Abuja,
described as “a misinterpretation'', media reports which quoted a
Supreme Court judgment to have sacked her and other federal lawmakers
from Anambra.
Reports in the media said that the apex
court had ordered the replacement of Oduah and other federal lawmakers
from the state saying that their nomination to contest in the 2015
election was wrong.
In a statement issued by Cynthia
Ferdinand, Press Secretary to the Senator, Oduah said that the report in
the media was misleading as the apex court did not order the withdrawal
of her certificate of return.
She said that the judgement of the
Supreme Court said that it was only the National Executive Council of a
political party that had the legal right to sponsor candidates in an
election.
Oduah, therefore, stressed that she and
all the other lawmakers from Anambra state have not been sacked by the
Supreme Court contrary to media reports.
``It is pertinent to note that this is a
mere misinterpretation of the Supreme Court rulings and should be
disregarded in all entirety.
``The Supreme Court did not order the withdrawal of the Certificates of Return issued by the Commission.
``It did not hold that the faction of the PDP had the right to sponsor candidates for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).
``It did not equally authorise the
Commission to substitute our clients with the individuals whose names
were on the list improperly allowed by the Commission,
``Series of judgment of the Supreme
Court of Nigeria states that it is only the National Executive of the
party that has the vires to sponsor candidates,” she said.
Meanwhile, the solicitors to the nine
lawmakers allegedly sacked, have written to the Independent National
Electoral Commission (INEC) not to also fall into the folly of
misunderstanding the judgment.
The letter signed by the lawmakers urged
the commission not to allow itself to be misled by its legal department
just as it was initially misled to accepting the list presented by the
state chapter of the party.
The lawmakers stressed that separate
rulings of the Supreme Court including that of Jan. 29, upheld that only
the list submitted by the National Executive Committee was valid.
``This correspondence is aimed at
setting the record straight so that your good self will not again be
misled by your legal department into unjustifiably occasioning an
unnecessary confusion in the process.
The letter also drew the attention of
INEC to pages 4647 and 48 of the judgment of the Supreme Court to
further buttress the point that the court did not sack their clients.
The solicitors stated further that the
apex court did not authorise the Commission to substitute the lawmakers’
names with the individuals whose names were on the list improperly
allowed by the Commission.
NAN reports that the media was awash
with reports that the Supreme Court had sacked the nine remaining
lawmakers from Anambra state.
(Source: NAN)
Stories that touched hian. Who cares anyway.
ReplyDeleteshakaranews.com